Friday, June 14, 2013

South Africa West Indies

2.14pm The sun is out. Covers are coming off. If we start by 1.10pm, we could have a game of something close to 40 overs a side
11.44am Okay it stopped drizzling for about a couple minutes. It is back now
"This is an interesting scenario - the longer the rain goes on, the more likely there will be a wash out and SA qualify. However, if play does get going at some point, the longer the rain goes on, the more likely WI will win in a shorter format of the game!" Marc, that sums up the dilemma
"Would it be possible for the West Indies to bat first. Score very quickly. The game to be washed out and West Indies to go through on NRR or not?" No, Ashley, only completed games count towards net run rate
11.41am Rain has stopped momentarily. If there is no more rain, we can start at 12.41pm, and we might have a game of more than 40 overs a side
"Highveldhillbilly has a point. West Indies didn't drop Ambrose Walsh or Bishop. Ambrose would have been a handful with the variable bounce." James, Ambrose that day: 10-0-29-1
11.30am Still raining, but very light. And it has got brighter too. Our calculations say that we must begin by 4.05pm if we are to have a 20-over game. That means the rain has to stop by 3.05pm
Highveldhillbilly: "With all due respect regarding the quarter final in 1996, while the pitch may have been tough to bat on SA's selection also didn't help matters. They dropped Donald and played two spinners. Let me repeat, they dropped Donald in 1996 when he was in his pomp and played two very average spinners. Ask Lara who he'd rather face dry pitch or no dry pitch. Remember watching that game as a very sad 13 year old, little did I know the 1999 world cup was around the corner - definitely the pinnacle of pain for an SA fan with a slightly unhealthy obsession with cricket."
"if Pakistan scored above 216 against SA , SA would have been out....credit is due @McLaren for taking last two wickets against pakistan" Strong point, Bimal
11.10am "I really hope the elements are not just toying with me! Rain and WI have played significant roles stopping SA at previous tournaments! Is this karma?"
Dale, I hear you. Knocked out by rain in 1992, and by West Indies in 1996. In fact I remember Fanie de Villiers telling me they didn't choke in that 1996 quarter-final. He said the pitch was so dry and full of cracks they were pleading with Hansie to win the toss because it would be impossible to chase on that wicket. Sure enough, Roger Harper and Jimmy Adams took seven wickets for 100 runs between them. For more from Fanie, go here and here
Still drizzling, by the way
10.55am Sameer: "@Nitin Chaudhary:When Morne came to bat to better the teams NRR, he had no clue by what margin WI would lose to India. "Thats why #Respect Morne Morkel""
"But am surprised, McLaren should get the credit if any, but why morkel who socred 8 of the 48 partnership" Ravi, not taking anything away from McLaren, but Morkel was not fit to bat and hobbled through that innings. McLaren wouldn't have had any partner to bat with had Morkel listened to his body
Meanwhile, still drizzling in Cardiff. We began to lose at 10.45am, assuming it takes an hour for ground to become fit once it stop raining and that we can take 15 minutes off the lunch break
10.45am "@Sid and all Morkal fans, Sorry to disappoint u guys but even without those 48 runs SA NRR is -0.07 (better than WI -0.086)" Nitin Chaudhary, I did the math just now, and I agree with your findings, but it is the spirit and the thinking that is being appreciated here
And Warren here talks about his economical bowling too: "Spot on! If play is suspended due to rain, then SA will go through to the semi's thanks th their better run rate, which was thanks to Morne Morkel's performance against India, both economical bowling and then coming to bat while injured and help his team add an extra 48 runs."
Leonard: "About the fantasy cricket. Had a look at the weather forecast and did not pick a single player playing today."
10.40am "You're going to have to change the name of it so it sounds good! Here's a link" Jonathan, I appreciate your and everybody's effort, but the PA man at Centurion, who is Morne's friends too, has created the best mix of all time. Of all time. There the tone of saying "Morne Morkel" is similar to the "Barbra Streisand" in the original, which by the way is a remix of Boney M's Gotta Go Home
10.30am To all those asking me about fantasy cricket, the transfers you make today won't come back even if not a single ball is bowled
10.20am Nick Ivey: "With respect to Morne Morkel and Barbra Streisand, try this"
10.15am Still raining. Nagraj tells me that about a thousand of the 10,000 who bought tickets have arrived at the ground. Most of them are at the Ymochen Du pub. Meanwhile the groundsman now says it will take an hour for the game to start once it stops raining. And it hasn't stopped raining yet
Peerzada: "WWOOOOOOOOOWOWOWOWOOOOOOOOOOOW­OWOOOO MORNE MORKEL WWOOOOOOOOOOOOOWOOOOWOOOOOOOOO­OOOOWOOOOOOOWOWOWOWOWOOOOOOOOO­OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWOOOOOOOOOOOO­OWOO MORNE MORKEL WOWOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWOOOOOOOOOOO­OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO­OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWOOOOO­OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO­OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWOOOO­OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO­OOOOOOOOOOO MORNE MORKEL WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWOOOO­OOOOOOOOOOOOOWOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWO­OOOOOOOOOOOWOOOOOOOOOOO"
10am "The format of the game is 50 overs per side. They should not change the format prior to the game to try and manufacture a result. If in the course of the game it becomes necessary to apply the DL system then so be it." Craig, I agree
And if South Africa do go through on net run rate, I want to take you back to the first match when the inured Morne Morkel came out to bat just so that South Africa could minimise their net-run-rate damage. Well done, Morne, who added 48 runs with Ryan McLaren. Time to listen to the Morne Morkel song. Well, in your heads, change every mention of Barbra Streisand to Morne Morkel in this song
9.45am "Say they get on at 2pm, and the forecast is for a 3-3.5 hour window before the rain returns. Do they play a 20 over game to a finish, or does the first innings last (say) 32 overs, meaning the game is washed out at 5.30?" James, you raise an interesting question, but we have to follow procedures. We can't assume it will start raining at 5.30pm again, can we? And what if we play just a 20-over game, and it doesn't rain? Won't it be unfair on sides that keep getting better with the length of the match? For the record, if the match starts at 2pm, we should be able to have a 37- of 38-over game in
9.30am Temporary good news. It has stopped drizzling, but they are expecting more so not taking the covers off in a hurry
Aabhas: "In such kind of a tournament where every game is important, surely there must be a case of having a spare day. There's no game in Cardiff tomorrow so why can't they have played tomorrow in case of a washout?"
"What's the deal with changing your fantasy team if rain delays the play??" Shreyansh, you have to make your changes by the scheduled start of play, which 10.30am BST, even if the start is delayed
9.15am Another day with early start to commentary. This time not because someone has punched someone, but because the weather has not been good in Cardiff. We are looking at a delayed start for sure, but the groundsmen believe there is a window for some play this afternoon. They are working hard, trying to remove excess water off the covers even as it rains so that they can be ready within 40-45 minutes once the rain stops. If we don't get a game in today, South Africa will go through thanks to a better net run rate
Commentator Sidharth Monga | Scorer Sanjay Murari

Herschelle Gibbs's reprieve enables Steve Waugh to play the greatest ODI innings of his life

Herschelle Gibbs's reprieve enables Steve Waugh to play the greatest ODI innings of his life
On June 13, 1999, Herschelle Gibbs duly dropped the World Cup, as Steve Waugh went on to play the greatest innings of his life. Karthik Parimal looks back in detail at the first of the two greatest One-Day Internationals played that week. 

“In a way, the story actually starts at the pre-game meeting. The very last comment came from the king [Shane Warne]: ‘If anyone hits the ball in the air in Herschelle’s direction and he catches you, don’t walk straightaway because he has a habit of “show boating” and he might drop it in the process.’ With a hint of scepticism, someone said, ‘Good point, Warney,’ and the meeting was over,” – Steve Waugh

The duel between Andre Agassi and Pete Sampras easily made for one of the greatest tennis rivalries in the Open era. In the 34 times they played each other from 1989 through 2002, Sampras had a 20-14 record over Agassi. People flocked the stands every time the two met, regardless of the round, for these stalwarts always gave a hundred per cent in the confines of the rectangular court. The others did too, but these two individuals operated on a different level.

A similar rivalry had been brewing on the cricket field, this between Australia and South Africa, just as the Agassi-Sampras Era was approaching twilight. Grounds were filled to the brim, even at neutral venues, for cricket of the highest grade was guaranteed. The two sides have been involved in at least four of the finest One-Day Internationals (ODI) ever played till date; the first of it kicked off at the historic Headingley in the Super Six stage of the 1999 World Cup.


The equation

Having lost to Pakistan and New Zealand in the group stages meant that the Australians were standing on thin ice in the Super Six, but victories against India and Zimbabwe provided them enough momentum. A win against South Africa, though, in the last match of that round, was imperative if they were to clinch a berth in the semi-final. On the other hand, the South Africans had already made the cut, but, owing to the complexity of this tournament’s model, were looking to finish above their rivals in the Super Six standings, for there was every possibility their place in the table could be of great significance ahead in the World Cup.

The sombre weather at Headingley greeted both teams.


Herschelle Gibbs puts Australian attack to sword

South African skipper Hansie Cronje won the toss and promptly opted to bat first. Australia’s famed attack was immediately put to test by openers Gary Kirsten and Gibbs. While one consolidated, the other attacked. Kirsten departed after scoring 21, but in Daryll Cullinan, Gibbs found an able partner. A 95-run stand ensued before Cullinan, with a fifty beside his name, succumbed to his nemesis Shane Warne.

Despite the fall of wickets at the other end, Gibbs continued to carve the Australian bowling line-up. Having comprehended the fact that he was in the zone, the process of ‘mental disintegration’ commenced, with lines such as ‘I wonder why Herschelle isn’t in the Test team?’ and ‘I can’t believe he’s not in the Test team — he must be a bit soft’ being exchanged between the fielders within the hearing range of Gibbs. However, on that day, he was timing each ball with an elegance bestowed only upon champions, and nothing could obstruct him. He finished on 101.

Once Gibbs departed, Lance Klusener, the swanky all-rounder, walked in and pummelled a 21-ball 36 to take South Africa’s total to 271. Their bowling department certainly had the firepower to defend it. Things certainly looked bleak for Australia.


Arguably, the greatest World Cup innings

Before this game, Steve Waugh’s position as a captain was beginning to be questioned. Talks surrounding it took a turn for the worse when the Australians put up a mediocre show during the first stage of the World Cup. In fact, Waugh pondered stepping aside. But, what followed went down in the annals of history as the greatest ever two games played by Australia, and perhaps the greatest individual innings in a World Cup.

The Australian top-order floundered as Mark Waugh, Adam Gilchrist and Damien Martyn contributed little. At 48 for three, two of the finest modern-day batsmen — Ricky Ponting and Steve Waugh — occupied the crease. The intent to build a partnership was evident, for risks were completely eliminated. In the next 10 overs, a meagre 22 runs were scored. The Australian supporters were understandably jittery. Nonetheless, the approach was the need of the hour. Soon, both batsmen stepped up a couple of gears and 82 runs were scored from the next 10 overs. The South African fielders were no longer smiling. Both Ponting and Waugh notched fifties, and then, an incident that will continue to haunt Gibbs for the rest of his life followed.



Waugh, who was as composed as ever, crossed paths mid-pitch after the over with an embarrassed-looking Gibbs and ‘couldn’t resist a jibe’. “’Hey Herschelle,’ I said, ‘do you realise you’ve just cost your team the match?’ My mouth was well ahead of my brain and almost out of control, but I still knew this moment was the turning point of the game,” states Waugh in his autobiography Out of My Comfort Zone.

It was widely reported at the time that Waugh had asked Gibbs ‘how it felt to drop the World Cup?’, but that wasn’t the case. "I wasn't quite that clever," Waugh told Australia's Inside Cricket magazine. "I wish I could claim that and the myth is sort of perpetuated and I'm going to break it a bit but it wasn't quite that. I just said: 'Look, do you realise you've just cost your team the game?'" In hindsight, it did cost South Africa the game and the World Cup.


An incredible ton

It indeed was a game-changing drop. Waugh punished the South African bowlers thereafter and, on 91, played what he believes was the greatest shot of his career. Steve Elworthy, the opening bowler, steamed in and bowled a full-length delivery, and Waugh, surprising all, employed a slog-sweep. The ball sailed miles over the longest boundary at Leeds. Waugh got himself into an awkward position playing that shot, but the satisfaction on his face was evident. “There are few greater joys than seeing a ball launch off your bat so well that it’s not a question of whether it’s a six but rather how far will it go,” recollects Waugh.



He spared none. Even the fear-inducing Allan Donald was carved mercilessly. A push to the on-side in the 43rd over, off Klusener’s slower delivery, brought up Waugh’s incredible 91-ball century, and although the celebrations weren’t loud, it certainly deserved to be, for an Australian victory now looked inevitable. A minor hiccup ensued when Michael Bevan was the fifth wicket to fall, with 26 runs still needed off 26 balls, but Tom Moody’s calming presence helped Waugh complete the job. He remained unconquered on 120. The Australians not just stormed into the semi-finals, they’d duly arrived. Moreover, the win moved them above South Africa in the Super Six stage, a statistic that would be of utmost importance in the coming days.
There was also newfound respect for Warne’s intuition.
 
Herschelle Gibbs's reprieve enables Steve Waugh to play the greatest ODI innings of his life

Brief scores:

South Africa 271 for 7 in 50 overs (Herschelle Gibbs 101, Daryll Cullinan 50; Damien Fleming 3 for 57, Shane Warne 2 for 33) lost to Australia 272 for 5 in 49.4 overs (Steve Waugh 120*, Ricky Ponting 69; Steve Elworthy 2 for 46) by 5 wickets.

(Karthik Parimal, a Correspondent with CricketCountry, is a cricket aficionado and a worshipper of the game. He idolises Steve Waugh and can give up anything, absolutely anything, just to watch a Kumar Sangakkara cover drive. He can be followed on Twitter at https://twitter.com/karthik_parimal )

Javed Miandad: A champion cricketer who redefined the art of war on the field of cricket

Javed Miandad: A champion cricketer who redefined the art of war on the field of cricket
Javed Miandad wrote in his autobiography: “As far as I was concerned, cricket was war and I was at war whenever I played” © Getty Images

Javed Miandad, born on June 12, 1957, was arguably the best-ever batsman from Pakistan. Abhishek Mukherjee looks back at the street-fighter who often squeezed all hope out of the opposition through his undiluted aggression by getting under the skin of the opposition.


Bangalore’s Chinnaswamy coliseum had turned into a cauldron during the 1996 World Cup quarter-final. As one Pakistan wicket followed another after the initial onslaught from Saeed Anwar and Aamer Sohail, the partisan crowd cheered, jeered, and swore in unison.A 39-year old, battle-scarred veteran, clad proudly in his greens, stood defiantly between India and a semi-final berth. He was eventually ninth out, sapping the last bit of life left in the Pakistanis. As the great man was run out with his side well short of victory, Bangalore stood up to boo him out of the stadium. It was his last international innings.

Ramachandra Guha describes the rest: “I stood up to applaud the veteran [Javed Miandad], leaving the cricket field for the last time. ‘What are you clapping him for?’ yelled a man behind me. ‘You should clap him too. He is a truly great player and we shall never see him again.’ The short, definitive reply: ‘Thank God I'll never see the b*#tard again.’”

That was the kind of emotion Javed Miandad induced in you if you were a non-Pakistani. You loathed him, and he gave you every reason to. Whatever be the situation, he would play out of his skin, stand between your side and Pakistan; he would get under your skin in every possible way; he would break the rules, if required; he would take blows if it was necessary — and then give back more; if he couldn’t win you, he will psyche you into submission; he was one who sledged while batting!

Ask Dilip Doshi. Miandad would often step out against him, and then block the ball with a dead bat, and follow it with the words, “I should have hit that for a six!” Or while Doshi was fielding, he would yell loud: “Come on, there’s two! It’s only [Dilip] Doshi!” Doshi ended up taking 27 wickets at 38.67 in the 11 Tests in which he played against Miandad, and 87 wickets at 28.25 from his remaining 22 Tests.

If you think Doshi was an easy nut to crack for Miandad, consider Ian Chappell, for whom sledging was as regular an activity as brushing teeth. In Kerry Packer’s World Series Cricket, Tony Greig had placed Miandad almost under Chappell’s nose when Derek Underwood was bowling. Asif Iqbal recalls: “Javed [Miandad] kept up a barrage of talk in Urdu with the name ‘Ian Chappell’ figuring prominently. And although none of it was abusive, Ian, unable to understand any of it, probably thought it was. He gradually reached the end of his tether and ended up holing out to deep mid-wicket.”

It had to be a victory, by hook or by crook. He writes in his autobiography Cutting Edge– My Autobiography: “As far as I was concerned, cricket was war and I was at war whenever I played.” Losing was never an option: he mentions that the “terrible embarrassment and shame [of defeat] brought tears to my eyes and a chill down my spine.”

As Gideon Haigh wrote of him, he was “sledging, jesting, fighting, winning, and getting up people's noses most of all”. You may swear at him, but at heart you cannot deny that he was a great batsman, warrior, and patriot. Perhaps the greatest Pakistan has ever produced.

image_20130612154720
Javed Miandad's stats bears eloquent testimony to his greatness © Getty Images

The achievements

To begin with, Miandad had scored 8,832 runs (the highest for Pakistan) from 124 Tests (again, the highest for Pakistan) at 52.57 (once again, the highest for Pakistan — provided you discount Taslim Arif’s 501runs at 62.62 from six Tests) with 23 hundreds. His tally of six double-hundreds is anotherPakistani record. His average had never dipped below the 50-mark— a feat achieved by only the great Herbert Sutcliffe over a sustained period of time. He had scored hundreds both in his debut Test and on his 100th Test—Gordon Greenidge being the only one to have achieved the feat.

In ODIs, he had scored 7,381 runs at 41.70 with eight hundreds. Being one of the ODI giants of his era, he was the first cricketer to play six World Cups— a feat later equalled by Sachin Tendulkar. When he quit, he was the highest run-scorer in World Cups (1,083 runs from 33 ODIs at 43.32). He is also the only batsman to score fifties in nine consecutive ODI innings (from March 24, 1987 to October 8, 1987: the phase also included two hundreds), the nearest count being six (shared by four batsmen across time).

At First-Class level, Miandad, playing several seasons for Sussex and Glamorgan, among other domestic matches, not only scored 28,863 runs at 53.37 with 80 hundreds, but also picked up 191 wickets at 34.07 with six five-fors with his leg-breaks. He also took 340 catches and effectedthree stumpings— when he occasionally adorned the gloves. His success made him a Wisden Cricketer of the Year in 1982.


The six

Ask any Indian or Pakistani about the moment that changed India-Pakistan cricket on its head, and he will definitely nominate the six. If you use the phrase “Miandad’s six” nothing else needs to be said. One can recall as if it was yesterday. India has scored 245 for seven in the allotted 50 overs in the final of the 1986 Austral-Asia Cup: Pakistan kept on losing wickets, and things looked hopeless till Miandad added 71 for the fifth stand with Abdul Qadir.

Eventually it came down to 11 off the last over, and then, with a wicket in hand, four runs off the last ball. Chetan Sharma would bowl it to Miandad. The shrewd man had anticipated everything the Indian team management had concluded after a long discussion. He later wrote in his autobiography: “I was certain [Chetan] Sharma was going to attempt a yorker and aim for my legs. So I decided to stand well forward of the batting crease. My plan was to lean back, make room for myself and give it everything I had.”

The rest was history. The waist-high full-toss soared out of the ground. The bowler slumped to the ground. The batsmen ran out of it in ecstasy. Miandad later went on to call the six “the single most important achievement of my professional career”. He was later gifted a diamond-encrusted bracelet worth $80,000, a Mercedes, and a promotion at Habib Bank. Above everything, he won the Pakistan President’s Pride of Performance Award.



Chandrakant Pandit later said: “We all felt a sort of blackout. It was like a funeral in the dressing room afterwards. Chetan [Sharma] was on the floor. None of us knew what to do for nearly an hour. Nobody looked at anyone; we all just sat with our chins down, thinking about the possibilities. We could hear the celebrations outside but it was extremely depressing inside.”

It took India well over a decade — till the Sahara Cup of 1997 where Sourav Ganguly finally turned the tides — to recover from the shock.Till then Pakistan had dominated the duels between the two countries to a phenomenal extent. As Kamran Abbasi wrote: “Pakistan began a run of success against India that was attributed to the psychological power of that six.”

It is not a coincidence that the end of Pakistan’s dominance coincided with the end of Miandad’s career. In his autobiography Miandad names a chapter Wars with India. It meant nothing less than that to him.



 Pakistan in ODIs against India: Impact of Miandad's six
 MWLNR% W/L
Before the six16     7     8       10.88
From the six to Sahara Cup 199736   26     8       23.25
From Sahara Cup 199772   38   33       11.15
Total124   71   49       41.45


How it all began

It all started in 1972. Karachi was playing against a local club, and their (somewhat defensive) captain was out there in the middle. With 18 required off three balls, our 14-year old hero went up to the manager and requested him to call the captain and send him to the middle.

Fortunately for Pakistan cricket, the manager decided to listen to the teenager in a logic-defying decision. The captain was asked to ‘retire out’, and the youngster won the match with three consecutive sixes!

Miandad was soon spotted by Abdul Hafeez Kardar, who called him ‘the find of the decade’. He made his Test debut against New Zealand at Lahore, and scored 163 not out; Asif and Miandad added 281, and took the score from 417 from 55 for four. He played a breezy 25 not out to seal the Test.

In the third Test of the series at Karachi, Majid Khan startled everyone by scoring a hundred before lunch on Day One. Miandad, however, played a relatively cautious innings, and in the process became the youngest player to score a double-hundred as he scored 206 at 19 years 140 days, going past George Headley’s 223 at 20 years 308 days. With 504 runs at 126.00 in the series, Miandad had arrived.



The style

Despite the abrasive attitude and furious combativeness, Miandad was as relaxed in the crease as any batsman who has ever played cricket. Seldom has a batsman laughed, chirped, sung, and whistled his way to century after century, much to the agony of bowlers and fielders over the world. Haigh wrote of him that he always “sauntered to the centre like he was already 180 not out”.

Consider his famous 271 at Eden Park in 1988-89, for example. He was so serene and effortless that it did not even seem that he was batting. Ian Smith later recalled that Miandad, during one of his comments, had told Smith: “Nice day today. Would be a lot nicer for you boys at the beach.” To John Wright, it seemed that Miandad was “sitting on a sofa in his front room” that day while batting.



On the other hand, Haigh considers him among the most aggressive batsmen he has seen: “Viv Richards merely made it look as though you weren’t good enough to bowl to him. [Javed] Miandad said it to your face.” Miandad was a vicious cutter and had a brilliant reverse-sweep in his repertoire, and played virtually all strokes in the MCC coaching manual — and a lot outside it.


Strength and weakness

Miandad’s fared differently against different opponents. He scored 2,228 runs against India (the third-highest, after Clive Lloyd and Ricky Ponting, and Miandad averages substantially more than either) from 28 Tests at 67.51 with five hundreds and 1,919 runs against New Zealand from 18 Tests at 79.95 with seven hundreds — which means that more than half his Test hundreds (23) came against these two countries.

He scored 4,351 runs from at 45.80 with six hundreds from 64 Tests overseas. If one discounts his phenomenal record in New Zealand (928 runs from 13 Tests at 77.33 with three hundreds) it comes down to 41.23. At home, however, Miandad was on a different scale altogether — scoring 4,481 runs at 61.38 with 14 hundreds.

In those days, before neutral umpires came into being, Miandad was given out leg-before only eight times out of the 86 innings (9%) in which he had batted. Contrast this to his 25 leg-before dismissals in 103 overseas innings (24%), and you will get the proper picture. His first leg-before dismissal at home came in his 50th home innings— against Sri Lanka at Sialkot in 1985-86.


West Indian exploits

Against West Indies, the strongest team of his time, Miandad had scored 834 runs from 16 Tests at 29.78 with two hundreds. These do not make great numbers – unless one remembers the fact that both these hundreds had come in arguably the greatest Test series of the 1980s, in which he was up against an attack consisting of Malcolm Marshall, Curtly Ambrose, Courtney Walsh, Patrick Patterson, and Winston Benjamin, and was more than equal to the challenge.

After West Indies were bowled out for 292 at Bourda, Miandad took centrestage, and carved out a 235-ball 114 to provide Pakistan with a crucial 143-run lead, and guide them to a nine-wicket victory, thanks to Imran Khan’s 11 for 121. Many critics refer to this as Miandad’s greatest Test hundred.

Come Queen’s Park Oval, and West Indies had Pakistan down to their knees (after Imran took nine for 153). Miandad, having scored 18 in the first innings, now stood firm in the way of West Indies. He was seventh out for a 265-ball 102, and Pakistan managed to finish with 341 for nine chasing 372.

He failed, for once, in the last Test at Kensington Oval, and West Indies scraped home by two wickets on the fifth afternoon. Miandad finished the series with most runs — 282 at 56.40 — ahead of Viv Richards, and along with Imran, was responsible for Pakistan leaving the Caribbean shores without losing the series.


The Miandad way

There have been on-field incidents where Miandad has been involved in: some of them were hilarious, some not quite so, and some on the brink of being ugly. One thing was for sure, though: he was not someone who would sit down to an on-field tussle, verbal or otherwise.

Consider the Rodney Hogg incident at Melbourne in 1978-79, for example. Hogg had placed a ball to Miandad at point, and took the customary stroll to pat the pitch. Miandad sneaked in, removed the bails, and appealed. Umpire Mick Harvey had to rule him out. Though the Pakistan captain Mushtaq Mohammad insisted on a recall, Harvey was adamant. Hogg kicked the stumps down before departing, and Miandad taunted him off the field.

The Dennis Lillee incident was another story altogether. During the 1981-82 WACA Test Miandad attempted a run, and Lillee blocked his way to the non-striker’s end; on his way back to his mark, Lillee kicked Miandad on his knee. A furious Miandad raised his bat – as if to hit Lillee – and it was only due to the intervention of Tony Crafter and Greg Chappell that the matter subsided.

Lillee later commented “When this sort of things happens I believe in an eye for an eye.” Wisden deemed it as “one of the most undignified incidents in Test history”. Bob Simpson called it “the most disgraceful thing I have seen on a cricket field”; Keith Miller demanded that Lillee “should be suspended for the rest of the season”; and Ian Chappell commented that Lillee had behaved like ‘a spoiled, angry child’.

On the other hand, Greg Chappell came out in Lillee’s defence: “If we thought he had been responsible in the first place for what happened, we’d have had no hesitation in rubbing him out. What [Javed] Miandad did was the most disgraceful thing I have seen on a cricket pitch.”

Lillee was originally fined A$200, but it was later reduced to A$120 — though a two-match ban was dished out. He was also asked to write an apology. When asked for his reaction, Miandad commented: “Lillee was concentrating on one word – retaliation – when he apologised. Everyone can see he is guilty.” Miandad got away without any kind of reprimand.



On the 1989-90 tour of Australia, Allan Border had specifically asked Merv Hughes, the Australian ace sledger, not to have a go at Imran or Miandad (and for whatever reason, target Wasim Akram and WaqarYounis instead).

So, in the battle of sledgers, Miandad called Merv Hughes a big, fat bus driver in the Adelaide Test; Hughes dismissed him shortly afterwards — and ran past Miandad with one hand raised, shouting “tickets, please!” For once Miandad had no response.



On another occasion, Kiran More managed to irk Miandad by incessant appealing in the 1992 World Cup match at Sydney. Miandad tolerated patiently for a while, but eventually gave in, jumping in the air and yelling at the top of his voice, stunning the entire ground into silence.



Miandad and Imran

The 1980s was a significant decade in the history of Pakistan cricket. It was in this decade that Abdul Qadir rekindled the magic of long-lost leg-spin; it was in this decade that Wasim began to blossom, and Waqar made his debut; it was also this decade when Imran and Miandad— arguably the two greatest cricketers Pakistan had ever produced – were at their peaks.

The decade, however, was also marred by the clash between the two titans. On one hand the two combined, hand-in-hand, to lead Pakistan to a number of triumphs, culminating in the 1992 World Cup – the tournament that had marked the end of Imran’s illustrious career.

It was not only a contest between two champions. It was a showdown between the sophistication of Lahore and the street-smartness of Karachi; it was a difference of social classes. As Arunabha Sengupta, CricketCountry’s Chief Cricket Writer and Cricket Historian wrote: “One [Imran] oozed charisma, Oxford chiselled sophistication and a pride in his ability that often got interpreted as arrogance. The other [Miandad] was crafty, street-smart, with a crude penchant for getting under the skin of opponents. Both were icons, two of the greatest cricketers produced by Pakistan.”

Miandad did not take Imran’s overnight declaration at Hyderabad in 1982-83 lightly. He was batting on 280, and on a flat track against a group of clueless Indian bowlers, he had been eyeing Garry Sobers’ 365 not out. When Imran declared the next morning without any prior indication, Miandad was shell-shocked: “Off the field at the end of the second day, there was no talk of a declaration. Imran [Khan] never brought it up overnight and gave me no specific instructions. I took this to mean I was being given a chance to go for all possible records. How wrong I was!”

On the other hand, when Miandad had his first stint as captain, his impressive tenure ended with a players’ rebellion — of which Imran is often assumed to be the instigator. Miandad has also voiced his opinion that Imran was instrumental in removing him as Pakistan captain in 1993.

Imran’s objections were not very well-documented, and had revolved mostly around off-field incidents. “They hint at [Javed] Miandad's scheming mind, regular face-offs with one and all, and his political games in the dressing room”, Sengupta adds.

On the field, however, Imran and Miandad gelled well, and had immense respect for each other as cricketers. When Pakistan lost a rain-affected match against South Africa in the 1992 World Cup, Imran threw his bat across the dressing-room in fury. As photo journalist Iqbal Munir tried to enter the dressing-room with the mission to acquire a photograph, he was hastily stopped by an intimidated Wasim Akram: “Where do you think you’re going? The only person who can approach Imran [Khan] right now is Javed [Miandad].”

Five years back, in the World Cup semifinal at Lahore, Miandad and Imran had added 112 runs for the fourth wicket (Miandad had scored 70 and Imran 58), but could not prevent Pakistan from crashing out of the tournament. This time, in the final of 1992, the pair had come to the forefront again: in an almost reversal of roles, Imran scored 72 and Miandad got 58, the two added 139 for the third wicket, and Pakistan won their only World Cup till date. Miandad scored six fifties in the tournament.



Captain of Pakistan

As it often happens with two champions with clashing careers and leadership qualities, neither Imran nor Miandad got to lead as many Tests as they should have. Miandad had often acted as the deputy to Imran, but the reverse was not a usual practice.

Imran, however, is generally accepted as the better leader, mostly due to his excellent man-management skills and ability to get the best out of the players; Miandad, however, came a close second, leading from the front and never stopping to give it back to the opposition. Miandad’s fans, however, think of the rating the other way. Let us dig deep into the numbers and check a bit.

 Overall records of Imran and Miandad as captains
 MWLNR% W/L
Imran 48 14 8 26 1.75
Miandad 34 14 6 14  2.33



Things do not look as expected, do they? The series only say that the gap is even more:

 Series records of Imran and Miandad as captains
 MWLNR% W/L
Imran 14 5 3 61.67
Miandad 11 8 3     -   2.67


It is true that numbers do not tell the entire story. What they can do is help us to challenge myths. Also, for the uninitiated, this is not a case of “Miandad took over a ready team from Imran”. Imran made his captaincy debut after Miandad had led them in as many as 13 Tests, so if anything it was the other way round.

Later years

Miandad had three stints as Pakistan’s coach, and was appointed the Director-General of PCB. He explored another side as he turned a Naat-Khua'an when he recorded a Naat for Geo TV.


Javed’s son Junaid Miandad got married to Mahrukh Ibrahim, the daughter of the Dawood Ibrahim, who has been a regular feature on the Forbes’ List of Most Dreaded Criminals, seldom going out of the top five. As an outcome Miandad was denied an Indian visa during the Pakistan tour of India in 2012-13.


Legacy

Despite the presence of greats like Hanif Mohammad, Zaheer Abbas, and Inzamam, there is little doubt that Miandad was the greatest of them all. His success went on to influence generations of Pakistan batsmen. The likes of Inzamam-ul-Haq have benefitted from his presence in the dressing-room, and the later batsmen like Mohammad Yousuf and Younis Khan have inherited – to various extents – his never-give-up attitude and his insatiable appetite for runs.

Pakistan has, and will continue to produce raw talent of various multitudes. Most of them fade away with time. Miandad, however, had stood the test of time, and had done more than almost anyone to establish Pakistan on the map of world cricket. There have been greater batsmen – but few as proud of his abilities and his country – and to give it back to the opposition, however strong.

No, there will certainly not be another Miandad.

ICC Champions Trophy 2013: England needs a power-hitter in their top four

ICC Champions Trophy 2013: England needs a power-hitter in their top four
(From left) Alastair Cook, Ian Bell, Jonathan Trott and Joe Root — England's strong top-order and four prolific run-scorers who provide stability. However, the necessary punch is missing and these men are generally content in setting the platform for the hitters to come © Getty Images

In Alastair Cook, Ian Bell, Jonathan Trott and Joe Root, England have a prolific top-order at the ICC Champions Trophy 2013. However, they might be missing a trick somewhere. They certainly need a man to muscle the ball at the top. Nishad Pai Vaidya explains why.  


Does England need a power hitter at the top? Numerous experts and commentators have said that their solid top-order needs an aggressor to take the attack to the opposition. Although England have a good record at home in One-Day Internationals (ODIs), the absence of that attacking batsman at the top may hurt them in the long run — especially at critical stages of a big event.

For the ICC Champions Trophy 2013, here are England’s top four: Alastair Cook, Ian Bell, Jonathan Trott andJoe Root. This is a strong top-order as it has four prolific run-scorers who provide stability. However, the necessary punch is missing and these men are generally content in setting the platform for the hitters to come. They are not natural hitters and usually play the waiting game.

Let us have a look at the ODI career strike-rates of the top four:

PlayerStrike-rate
Alastair Cook78.26
Ian Bell74.96
Jonathan Trott76.14
Joe Root83.95

Strike-rates in the 70s aren’t good enough in the modern era. Cook, Bell and Trott may pile the runs, but need to score at a better rate if England are to do well. Root has played only 12 games and his strike-rate is decent — a number that might go up as his career progresses.

While playing a stable hand does bring value, it can backfire. Scoring at a relatively slower rate may put tremendous pressure on the aggressive middle-order. One cannot expect them to turn the tables on every occasion and it is a tough ask. England’s recent game against Australia is the best example to illustrate the point. Trott and Bell set-up a good platform, but England were motoring along — at a rate around five runs per over. They lost wickets in a heap and ended with only 269. Australia did not chase and it was largely due to a good bowling performance. Perhaps a more in-form unit wouldn’t have had much trouble in overhauling the challenge.

England should find a way to rearrange their batting order to add dynamism to their ranks. The interesting thing is that all their hard-hitters are in the middle — Jos Buttler, Eoin Morgan and Ravi Bopara. If one of them is promoted to the top four, it would certainly bring in a fresh change and the opposition may review their strategies while bowling to England.

Cook has come a long way in ODIs since he has taken over the mantle of leadership. There is more urgency to his game and his solid technique comes in handy while tackling the new ball. At the other end, you have Bell – who has a similar approach. England should consider sending in a more aggressive player at that spot as that would complement Cook well. Trott cannot be moved from No 3 as he holds the innings together.

It is obvious that the absence of Kevin Pietersen robs them of the aggressor. The right-hander is a fearsome hitter and often intimidates the opposition. He can score at a very good clip and change the course of the game in a matter of minutes. When fit, he walks into the top four and it looks a completely different unit.

It is a bit of teaser for England as they have to deal with four men in form. But, they have to realize that other teams may surge ahead owing to a more dynamic top-order. The stronger One-Day units would capitalize on that flaw and trump England. It is time they threw the wind in the sails earlier than they usually do. Otherwise, it might cost them dearly at some point.

ICC Champions Trophy 2013 stats highlights: England vs Sri Lanka

ICC Champions Trophy 2013 stats highlights: England vs Sri Lanka
Kumar Sangakkara established a record for the highest individual score by a Sri Lankan batsman in the ICC Champions Trophy © Getty Images
London: Jun 14, 2013 

Statistical highlights of the Champions Trophy Group A match between England and Sri Lanka.

# Joe Root (68 off 55 balls) posted his first fifty in the ICC Champions Trophy — his fourth in ODIs.

# Root's strike rate of 123.63 is the third highest by an England batsman in the ICC Champions Trophy [minimum 50].


# Kulasekara has recorded a fifty each vs England, Australia and New Zealand in ODIs.

# Kulasekara, for the first time, recorded a fifty in a winning cause in ODIs.

# Kumar Sangakkara's unbeaten 134 off 135 balls is the second highest score by a wicketkeeper in the ICC Champions Trophy. Zimbabwe's Andy Flower's had registered an unbeaten 145 off 164 balls vs India at Colombo, RPS on September 14, 2002. Apart from Flower and Sangakkara, no other wicketkeeper has posted a century in the ICC Champions Trophy.

# Sangakkara has established a record for the highest individual score by a Sri Lankan batsman in the ICC Champions Trophy, bettering the 132 off 146 balls by Avishka Gunawardene vs West Indies at Nairobi on October 4, 2000.

# Sangakkara became the first Sri Lankan player to record a century vs England in the ICC Champions Trophy.

# Sangakkara's match-winning knock is the second highest in a successful chase in the ICC Champions Trophy behind an unbeaten 136 by Australia's Shane Watson vs England at Centurion on October 2, 2009.

# Sangakkara's innings is his 15th century in ODIs — his first against England. With 663 runs at an average of 41.43 in 20 matches, he is the leading run-getter for Sri Lanka in the ICC Champions Trophy.

# Sangakkara recorded his first century in ODIs in England. His unbeaten innings is the highest individual innings by any batsman against England at The Oval.

# Sangakkara got his 21st Man of the Match award in ODIs — his second vs England.

 # Sri Lanka [297 for three] posted their highest total against England in the ICC Champions Trophy. It is thehighest successful chase in the ICC Champions Trophy.

# The only team to register two losing totals of 300-plus in the second innings is South Africa in the ICC Champions Trophy — 305 vs India at Cardiff on June 6, 2013 and 301 for nine vs England at Centurion on September 27, 2009.

# England (293/7) posted their highest total vs Sri Lanka in the ICC Champions Trophy.

# Sri Lanka's splendid seven-wicket victory is their first in three games vs England in the ICC Champions Trophy - their 25th in 51 ODIs vs England — success rate 49.01.

# The Oval ODI is England's 600th — their 18th in the ICC Champions Trophy.

# Jonathan Trott (76 off 87 balls) recorded his 21st fifty in ODIs — his first in the ICC Champions Trophy and the third vs Sri Lanka.

# Sangakkara and Jayawardene were associated in a 85-run partnership — Sri Lanka's highest third-wicket stand against England in the ICC Champions Trophy.

# The 110-run unbroken fourth-wicket stand between Sangakkara and Kulasekara is Sri Lanka's highest for any wicket against England in the ICC Champions Trophy.

# Three half-centuries have been registered in England's innings and for the first time, any team has recorded four such instances in the ICC Champions Trophy. Also three fifties in an innings have been recorded vs Sri Lanka for the first time in the ICC Champions Trophy.

# Shaminda Eranga (10-0-80-2) produced his worst bowling performance in ODIs.

# Alastair Cook (59 off 85 balls) recorded his first fifty in the ICC Champions Trophy. His strike rate of 69.41 is his second slowest in an innings of fifty-plus behind the 65.04 during his knock of 80 off 123 balls against Sri Lanka at Colombo (RPS) on October 10, 2007.

 # Cook, as England captain, has recorded four centuries and 14 fifties in 46 innings. His third fifty vs Sri Lanka is his 17th in ODIs.

# Bell's tally of 602 [ave.50.16] in thirteen matches, including a hundred and four fifties, is the highest in ODIs this year.

# Cook and Trott were involved in a second-wicket partnership of 83 — England's highest second-wicket stand vs Sri Lanka in the ICC Champions Trophy.

# Ravi Bopara [33 not out off 13 balls]] registered a strike rate of 253.84 — the second highest in the ICC Champions Trophy behind Shahid Afridi's 305.55 during his unbeaten knock of 55 off 18 balls vs Netherlands at Colombo, SSC on September 21, 2002.[minimum 25 runs].

# Bopara, in the course of his innings, completed his 2000 runs in ODIs, totalling 2006 [ave.31.84] in 86 ODIs to become the 22nd batsman to accomplish the feat for England.

# Root and Trott put on 87 for the third wicket — England's highest vs Sri Lanka in the ICC Champions Trophy.

The said partnership is their second highest for any wicket vs Sri Lanka behind the 94 for the fifth wicket between Paul Collingwood and Andrew Flintoff at Southampton on September 17, 2004.

# Rangana Herath [2/46] recorded his best bowling figures vs England in ODIs apart from producing his best in the ICC Champions Trophy.

# The unbroken 39-run partnership between Bopara and Broad is England's highest eighth-wicket stand against Sri Lanka in the ICC Champions Trophy.

# Sangakkara and Dilshan shared a second-wicket stand of 92 — Sri Lanka's highest against England in the ICC Champions Trophy.